Thursday, November 28, 2019
Censorship Essays (642 words) - Anti-pornography Feminism
  Censorship    Sex, Erotica, nude women, three some, these are some keywords for finding pornography  on the internet. The   censorship of pornography has a positive affect on the United States of America and is a  good thing because   pornography leads to crime, pornography has no positive affects on society, and censoring  pornography is not   against the constitution. Crimes and pornography have a direct and apparent link.  Eighty-one percent of   criminals rate pornography as their highest sexual interest ( ). This means that the clear  majority of criminals love   pornography and find it highly interesting, most other people probably rank other human  beings as their highest   sexual interest. When an adult book store is closed the crime rate in the surrounding areas  falls significantly (   188). Also It was found that child molesters have a higher probability of molesting a larger  number of victims   and it is likely that these offenders have some access to pornography or erotica. ( 189).  Over all crime and   pornography do have a link between them and that makes censoring it a positive idea for  America. Pornography   has no positive effect on society. The American population agrees that pornography does  not serve a legitimate   purpose. Seventy-two percent of Americans want some sort of crack down on  pornography. Also Ninety-two   percent of Americans want a crack down on child pornography because it has no value  and is disgusting and   against the law ( 179). Pornography was found to have little redeeming social value by  artistic criteria and is   close to worth less ( 218). The censoring of pornography is not against the United States  Constitution. The   reason why pornography is not included under the constitution is because it was  demeaned by the United States   Supreme court in 1973 to be lewd and obscene material ( 173). The first amendment was  intended to protect   political speech in America not the speech that includes the exploiting of women and  photography of women   being raped ( 183). The founding fathers did not intend for their bill of rights to be  exploited in the ways that it is   today they would have wanted us to have a safe and peaceful society. That would be one  that does not include   pornography. The opposition to the censoring of pornography will say that it is against the  United States   Constitution, which it is not. They will also say that it is censoring thoughts and ideas not  actions. Lastly they will   say that if you censor one thing what is there to keep you censoring other things and that  will lead to the collapse   of what America was built on freedom. First, there are no legitimate arguments against  censorship all of the   arguments are intended to frighten one into believing the way they do. The argument that  the censorship of   pornography is against the constitution is a false and ludicrous idea. The Supreme court  did rule that it is not   against the constitution to censor pornography. The censorship of pornography does not  censor thought and   ideas it does not say that one needs to not ever have a dirty thought or even that one can  not talk about it to   someone else. What it does mean is that by censoring material published in the media form  we will be protection   our society. Last is the most ridiculous argument of all the on that says that if you censor  one thing it will cause   you to censor more and more things until the there is nothing left to censor. The censorship  of pornography has   worked in many other countries before an it has not caused a massive increase in the  censoring of other ideas   what it did cause was a fall in crime rates ( 174). The one thing the opposition failed to  prove was what is   pornography's positive affect on society. In conclusion the censorship of pornography  does not have a   downside. It will decrease the crime rate, it will make America a better society, and will  up hold what the   founding fathers want free political speech not free speech to watch children getting raped.    Current Events Essays    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.